露露精准六肖中特|美女六肖中特图香港|

您好,欢迎访问新航道官网雅思频道!我们更懂雅思!

在线咨询

雅思 (IELTS)

雅思官方白金级合作伙伴

2019新航道春季班

您当前的位置 ? 新航道官网 ? 雅思 ? 雅思写作 ? 文章正文

4月13日雅思大作文真题参考范文

2019-04-17 14:08     供稿单位: 新航道    

出国英语考试有哪些 雅思6.5是什么水平 雅思阅读评分标准 托福阅读评分标准 雅思和托福的区别

  每场雅思考试之后,第一时间分享本场考试雅思A类大作文的范文权威解析。欢迎每周锁定。

  2019年4月13

  雅思大作文题目

  名人支持国际救助组织是好还是坏?

  “Some people believe famous people's support towards international aid organizations draws the attention to the problem, while others think celebrities make the problem less important.

  Discuss both views and give your opinion. ”

  

  解析&审题

  本题的关键词是“名人”和“国际救助组织”,问题是:如果名人对国际救助组织表示支持,这能让人们关注到需要救助的问题,还是转移人们的注意力?

  雅思作文考题中提出的观点多半都不是那种可以简单同意或者反对的观点,往往是既有合理的成分,也有不合理的成分,这?#25176;?#35201;烤鸭自己去分析其合理和不合理的地?#21073;?#24182;结合自己的经历进行分析。

  虽然雅思考试并不一味反?#38405;?#20123;“一边倒”的作文,但那些能体现出“批判性思维”的作文显然更受考官的喜爱。简单地说,“批判性思维?#26412;?#26159;能在别人肯定的观点中?#39029;?#19981;合理的因素,而在别人否定的观点中?#39029;?#21512;理的因素。这种写法对很多中国烤鸭来说很有挑战性,因为中国学生已经习惯于背诵被人给出的答?#31119;?#32780;不是自己去分析思考。

  本题?#26657;?#25105;们需要回答?#22909;?#20154;如果支持国际救助组织,这是好还是坏?可能有些同学直接就回答,这当然是好事!但如果大?#20197;?#20180;细想想,名人有多种多样,有些名人就是纯娱?#32622;?#26143;,他们来参和国际救助组织这样严肃的事情,会不会适得其反呢?另外,还有些名人根本没有实际行动,只是动动嘴皮,这样的名?#24605;?#20837;国际救助组织,效果会怎么样呢?因此,在本题?#26657;?#22914;果我们把“名人”进行分类讨论,那我们的结论就会与主流观点不同了,于是也?#25176;?#25104;了“批判性思维”。

  以下是?#35780;?#24072;的高分范文,大家可认真阅读,看老师是如何把以上思路落实到具体文字表达的。



  老师笔记

  01

  Today, more and more famous people find themselves in international aid campaigns. Some people believe it is certainly good to the aid programs, while others argue that it actually makes the general public less attentiveto the campaigns themselves. To my mind, celebrities can be of great help to such campaigns.

  今天,越来越多的名人参加国?#35797;?#21161;活动。一些人认为这对援助计划无疑是有益的,而另一些人则认为这实际上会降低公众对援助活动的关注度。在我看来,名人对这类活动有很大帮助。

  解析

  (1)先提出话题(名人参加国?#35797;?#21161;活动),然后重述题目观点,并给出自己的观点。

  (2)Be attentive to… 关注……

  (3)To my mind 在我看来

  (4)Celebrity 名人





  02

  Obviously, international charity groups can take advantage of the publicity of those famous people. They can draw more media attention and make more people recognize the importance of a certain issue. For this reason, with celebrities cutting in, the international aid organizations can publicize their programs more effectively. At the same time, the viewing public, especially fans, will answer the appeal of their favorite stars and take concrete action such as donating money to help deal with problems in other countries.

  显然,国际慈善团体可以利用这些名人的曝光度。它们可以吸引更多的?#25945;?#20851;注,使更多的人认识到某个问题的重要性。因此,随着名人的加入,国?#35797;?#21161;组织可以更有效地宣传他们的项目。同时,观众,尤其是粉丝,?#19981;?#22238;应他们最喜爱的明星的号召,采取具体行动,如捐钱帮助解决其他国家的问题。

  解析

  (1)本段论述名?#24605;?#20837;救助组织的好处:增加曝光度,利用名人的影响来影响大众。

  (2)Charity 慈善

  (3)Take advantage of 利用

  (4)Draw media attention 吸引?#25945;?#20851;注

  (5)For this reason 因此

  (6)Cut in 切入

  (7)Appeal 号召

  (8)Take concrete action 采取实际行动

  (9)Donate 捐献



  03

  Nevertheless, the involvement of famous stars in aid campaigns is not always helpful. We have seen many cases in which the public forget all about the people in need when they are cheering for their stars. Indeed, some entertainment stars can make the aid campaigns less serious than they are supposed to be. Besides, some irresponsible celebrities could even arouse negative attitudes of the public. What effect can it bring about when a celebrity asks people to give aid to the poverty-stricken children while he lives a luxurious life without giving away a dollar himself?

  ?#27426;?#33879;名明星参与援助活动并不总是有益的。我们看到过许多这样的情况:当人们为他们的明星欢呼时,他们会全然忘记那些需要帮助的人。事实上,一些娱?#32622;?#26143;可能使援助活动没有了理应的那份严肃。此外,一些不负责任的名人甚至可能引起公众的?#22909;?#24577;度。当一个名人要求人们帮助贫困儿童,而他自己却生活奢侈也不捐献一分钱的时候,会产生什么效果呢?

  解析

  (1)本段主要论述名人参加救助活动可能带来的?#22909;?#24433;响,注意这里共讨论了三种情况:人们见到明星忘记了“初心”;娱?#32622;?#26143;让救助活动显得不甚严肃;不负责任的明星甚至带来?#22909;?#24433;响。

  (2)Involvement 参与;卷入

  (3)People in need 贫穷的人;需要帮助的人

  (4)Entertainment stars 娱?#32622;?#26143;

  (5)Be supposed to do… 应该做……

  (6)Poverty-stricken 贫穷的

  (7)Luxurious 奢侈的

  (8)Give away 捐献




  04

  In my view, although celebrities participating in aid programs may bring some undesirable influences, I believe they are more useful than negative.  Of course, the famous people, in order to set a positive example for the general public who love them, should make sincere efforts to help those people in need rather than just pay lip services.

  在我看来,虽然参加援助计划的名人可能会带来一些不?#21152;?#21709;,但我相信他们的?#20040;?#35201;大于消极之处。当然,为了给爱他们的大众树立一个积极的榜样,名人应该真诚地努力帮助那些需要帮助的人,而不仅仅是口头说说。

  解析

  (1)总结前面的主要观点,并提出建议。

  (2)Participate in 参加

  (3)Undesirable 不良的,不好的

  (4)Set an example for… 为……树立榜样

  (5)Pay lip services 口头说说


  Today, more and more famous people find themselves in international aid campaigns. Some people believe it is certainly good to the aid programs, while others argue that it actually makes the general public less attentive to the campaigns themselves. To my mind, celebrities can be of great help to such campaigns.

  Obviously, international charity groups can take advantage of the publicity of those famous people. They can draw more media attention and make more people recognize the importance of a certain issue. For this reason, with celebrities cutting in, the international aid organizations can publicize their programs more effectively. At the same time, the viewing public, especially fans, will answer the appeal of their favorite stars and take concrete action such as donating money to help deal with problems in other countries.

  Nevertheless, the involvement of famous stars in aid campaigns is not always helpful. We have seen many cases in which the public forget all about the people in need when they are cheering for their stars. Indeed, some entertainment stars can make the aid campaigns less serious than they are supposed to be. Besides, some irresponsible celebrities could even arouse negative attitudes of the public. What effect can it bring about when a celebrity asks people to give aid to the poverty-stricken children while he lives a luxurious life without giving away a dollar himself?

  In my view, although celebrities participating in aid programs may bring some undesirable influences, I believe they are more useful than negative.  Of course, the famous people, in order to set a positive example for the general public who love them, should make sincere efforts to help those people in need rather than just pay lip services.

  (284 words)

  建议背诵的句子

  1. Some people believe it is certainly good to the aid programs, while others argue that it actually makes the general public less attentive to the campaigns themselves.

  一些人认为这对援助计划无疑是有益的,而另一些人则认为这实际上会降低公众对援助活动的关注度。

  2. For this reason, with celebrities cutting in, the international aid organizations can publicize their programs more effectively.

  因此,随着名人的加入,国?#35797;?#21161;组织可以更有效地宣传他们的项目。

  3. We have seen many cases in which the public forget all about the people in need when they are cheering for their stars.

  我们看到过许多这样的情况:当人们为他们的明星欢呼时,他们会全然忘记那些需要帮助的人。

  2. What effect can it bring about when a celebrity asks people to give aid to the poverty-stricken children while he lives a luxurious life without giving away a dollar himself?

  当一个名人要求人们帮助贫困儿童,而他自己却生活奢侈也不捐献一分钱的时候,会产生什么效果呢?

  5. Of course, the famous people, in order to set a positive example for the general public who love them, should make sincere efforts to help those people in need rather than just pay lip services.

  当然,为了给爱他们的大众树立一个积极的榜样,名人应该真诚地努力帮助那些需要帮助的人,而不仅仅是口头说说。





分享?#21073;?/span>
新航道,英语成功之道。第一时间获取新航道英语学?#30333;?#26009;和新?#39318;?#35759;,请在微信公众账号中搜索「新航道英语」或者「xhdenglish」,或用手机扫描左方二维码,即可获得新航道每日精华内容推送和最新英语学习经验分享,并参与新航道举办的各项活动。
责编:梁曦丹
露露精准六肖中特